home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / cbm / 1597 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-08-05  |  1.1 KB  |  28 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
  2. Path: undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!csbruce
  3. From: csbruce@ccnga.uwaterloo.ca (Craig Bruce)
  4. Subject: Re: The SuperCPU 64/20 and SuperCPU 128
  5. Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner)
  6. Message-ID: <DM216t.Gs3@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
  7. Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:44:53 GMT
  8. References: <4dmevj$sut@news.cc.ucf.edu> <4ea3c3$qt3@news-2.csn.net> <4ebqf5$a1n@wumpus.cc.uow.edu.au> <RPiDxwyjtUCE088yn@mail.msen.com>
  9. Nntp-Posting-Host: ccnga.uwaterloo.ca
  10. Organization: University of Waterloo, Canada (eh!)
  11.  
  12. Jim Brain <brain@mail.msen.com> wrote:
  13.  
  14. >The fastest part from WDC at present is 20 MHz, However, you should be able to 
  15. >overclock the thing to 25 or so without any problem.  Also, WDC does die
  16. >shrinks every year or twice a year.  They seem to get 4MHz more at every die
  17. >shrink.
  18.  
  19. I thought that the 20-MHz processors that CMD is going to use in its
  20. SuperCPU were already overclocked (but certified) by WDC from 14 MHz.
  21.  
  22. Keep on Hackin'!
  23.  
  24. -Craig Bruce
  25. csbruce@ccnga.uwaterloo.ca
  26. "It's hardware that makes a machine fast.  It's software that makes a fast
  27.  machine slow."
  28.